←back to thread

677 points meetpateltech | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.753s | source
Show context
extr ◴[] No.45117263[source]
Zed is so great, I do wish they would focus just a little bit more on bringing the UI just a bit more up to parity with VS Code, I would switch full time.
replies(3): >>45117325 #>>45117438 #>>45118430 #
TheRoque ◴[] No.45117438[source]
What's so great about zed ?
replies(4): >>45117489 #>>45117862 #>>45118952 #>>45124588 #
simonw ◴[] No.45117489[source]
It uses a fraction of the memory of VS Code and is much faster to launch.
replies(3): >>45117638 #>>45118055 #>>45118794 #
1. trashface ◴[] No.45118055[source]
Do people really need that with modern computers? My computer is 10 years old and I just restarted VS in the last project I was working on. It was about 4-5 seconds before I could edit the text, which doesn't seem long. And I have 17GB available memory. Anyway it doesn't matter because I just don't restart VSCode that much. I do open projects in new windows and those can get slow, but the slow ones are mostly just rust code with rust-analyzer overhead, and when dealing with rust, slow-opening projects are only the beginning.

I don't know, it feels like Zed popularity is just people chasing the latest editor hotness, a time-honored traditional programmer ritual to be sure, but still, just a ritual. And now it seems zed devs have to put AI in front of all other initiatives, probably because of the VC funding they took.

I could see not wanting to use VSCode for other reasons, like MS pivoting back to "be evil", but at least in my little bubble, performance is not one of them.

replies(1): >>45118821 #
2. veber-alex ◴[] No.45118821[source]
I agree with you.

I tried Zed several times and I just don't see the point.

The main issues with VScode over something like the Jetbrains IDEs is that language servers are just not as powerful or as integrated to the IDE as the Jetbrains solution can be and Zed does nothing to solve it.

I don't think it being a native app offers much added value.

replies(1): >>45121391 #