←back to thread

181 points Bogdanp | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source | bottom
1. biohazard2 ◴[] No.45116985[source]
Two articles providing more information about the creation of this font: https://lii.enac.fr/projects/definition-and-validation-of-an... https://www.enac.fr/fr/une-police-realisee-par-les-chercheur...

In particular, a screen of an Airbus screen and a video showing parts of the creation are provided.

replies(1): >>45117911 #
2. kens ◴[] No.45117911[source]
Curiously, the photo of the screen shows slashed zeros, while the font sample shows non-slashed zeros.
replies(3): >>45118427 #>>45132107 #>>45132586 #
3. AlfredDogsbody ◴[] No.45118427[source]
I noticed the same thing. It's the first thing I check when someone describes a font as "legible." I want to see O0olI|i diplayed.
4. saltcured ◴[] No.45132107[source]
The photo actually shows some slashed and some non-slashed zeros too. Look at the PSI numbers on the left versus the time numbers in the center right.

That doesn't seem great from a UX standpoint.

5. bitschubser_ ◴[] No.45132586[source]
codepoint E007 is a slashed zero... would be interesting to know why this is not the default
replies(1): >>45132619 #
6. bitschubser_ ◴[] No.45132619{3}[source]
strangely its not included in the regular font face... only in the italic, bold, bold italic and monospace variant

0123456789