←back to thread

The staff ate it later

(en.wikipedia.org)
477 points gyomu | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.213s | source
Show context
Y_Y ◴[] No.45105801[source]
> Then Pharaoh also called for the wise men and the sorcerers, and they also, the magicians of Egypt, did the same with their secret arts. For each one threw down his staff and they turned into serpents. But Aaron’s staff swallowed up their staffs.

- Exodus 7:1-12 (NIV)

Many moons ago I had a girlfriend who worked on an nationally broadcast afternoon show where they often had guest chefs demonstrating dishes, so I would come home from my thankless PhD work to eat Michelin-starred food from a lunchbox. Overall not so bad.

replies(5): >>45106174 #>>45112053 #>>45113394 #>>45113470 #>>45114493 #
bambax ◴[] No.45113394[source]
Not sure what the quote has to do with anything here, but it's a as good an opportunity as ever to say that large parts of the "Old Testament" draw most of its inspiration from the code of Hammurabi ("an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth"), the Epic of Gilgamesh (which gave us, notably, the story of the deluge, and the dark role of the serpent) and Ancient Egypt, to which it owes, among many others, the concept of eternal life and the idea that man was made in God's image.

To be "in God's image" was one of the titles of Pharaoh.

And about the staff: early depictions of Jesus often have him holding a magic wand [0], as he was considered by followers and ennemies alike to be a magician. The "Three Wise Men" or "Three Kings" (?!) that show up at his birth are just "magi" (magicians) in the original text [1].

[0] https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/people-cultures-in...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_Magi

replies(9): >>45113557 #>>45113684 #>>45114068 #>>45114434 #>>45114700 #>>45115715 #>>45115776 #>>45115905 #>>45120418 #
danhau ◴[] No.45114068[source]
These depictions can probably be dismissed, just as any other depiction of Jesus. That painting has been made long after his death. The only clues to his likeness are deductions from biblical texts and historical context. For example, he most likely didn‘t have long hair (1. Corinthians 11), and he also wasn‘t European looking (should be obvious).
replies(1): >>45114273 #
barry-cotter ◴[] No.45114273[source]
> he also wasn‘t European looking (should be obvious).

Spaniards, Egyptians, Greeks and Levantines all look very similar and Jesus was definitely of the Levant. I hope you won’t deny Spaniards and Greeks are European.

replies(1): >>45114335 #
krapp ◴[] No.45114335[source]
In this context, "European" means "white." Jesus probably did not look like the bearded white hippie commonly depicted in Western (primarily American and British) iconography.

Spaniards, Egyptians, Greeks and Levantines may or may not look similar (seems a bit broad, like the geographical definition of "European") but they also don't often look like "white people." Especially not in Egypt or the Levant.

replies(3): >>45115981 #>>45116109 #>>45116183 #
1. jibal ◴[] No.45115981[source]
Weird which of these two comments was downvoted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_appearance_of_Jesus#H...

> in terms of physical appearance, the average Judean of the time would have likely had brown or black hair, honey/olive-brown skin, and brown eyes

This entire digression has been brought to you by someone who didn't understand an obvious pun.