←back to thread

298 points croes | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.234s | source
Show context
alex_f_k ◴[] No.45089306[source]
From lttlabs:

> The inability for most docks to support the Switch 2 may not be malicious from Nintendo. It might just be a poor or lazy implementation of the USB-C specification

From the verge [0], 2 months ago:

> When I analyze the conversation between the Nintendo Switch 2 and its dock, I can see the two devices begin speaking in Nintendo’s own flavor of “vendor defined” language early in the conversation, before they sign off on any video output. And then, seemingly before the dock confirms that it’s engaged video-out, they send over 30 proprietary “unstructured” messages to one another.

> […]

> According to Antank, which says it checked with its chip supplier, that hexadecimal string “is indeed the current key being used by Nintendo.” My other sources are less sure.

I'm pretty sure lttl's conclusion is plain wrong. It is not JUST lazy USB-C implementation, but a purposefully designed special proprietary protocol on top of USB-C

[0] https://www.theverge.com/report/695915/switch-2-usb-c-third-...

replies(9): >>45089407 #>>45090090 #>>45090873 #>>45091094 #>>45091140 #>>45092225 #>>45093299 #>>45095096 #>>45101685 #
notrealyme123 ◴[] No.45089407[source]
At least on the video they made it quite clear that they assumed thant Nintendo did it on purpose, but they did not have enough proof to actually say it.

So instead they sad "Nintendo stopped early with developing compatibility"

replies(2): >>45090319 #>>45092961 #
1. nintendohater ◴[] No.45092961[source]
It's called plausible deniability, i.e. Nintendo can claim they were just ignorant, and there's no proof of the contrary. That is, until EU rightfully fines them.