←back to thread

462 points JumpCrisscross | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
lazarus01 ◴[] No.45078568[source]
In NYC, for the first 6 months of 2025, 994 new private sector jobs were created [1]. During the same period last year, there were 66,000 new jobs created.

Higher cost of doing business from tariffs has frozen hiring. With a frozen job market, there’s less revenue coming in.

NYC is a leading indicator for the rest of the country.

[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/13/nyregion/nyc-jobs.html

replies(13): >>45078595 #>>45078679 #>>45078740 #>>45078958 #>>45079382 #>>45080115 #>>45080271 #>>45080965 #>>45081316 #>>45082066 #>>45083020 #>>45083528 #>>45083540 #
macintux ◴[] No.45078595[source]
I’m curious whether it’s more the tariffs, or the uncertainty. No one knows what will happen on a day-to-day basis: the chaotic (and illegal) decision-making leaves everyone wondering what’s next.
replies(4): >>45078705 #>>45081223 #>>45082312 #>>45091612 #
YZF ◴[] No.45078705[source]
The hiring slowdown predates tariffs. For various reasons CEOs either believe they can do more with less people, or that they can hire cheaper people in other geographies, or both. Businesses (tech or financials) don't seem to be telegraphing uncertainty, S&P 500 revenue is at all times high and trending up, earnings/profit all time highs and trending up, valuations all times high and trending up.
replies(6): >>45079312 #>>45079399 #>>45079547 #>>45081230 #>>45082541 #>>45084035 #
vkou ◴[] No.45079312[source]
> The hiring slowdown predates tariffs.

That's true, but it didn't predate the election of a man who has made his understanding of tariffs and economics crystal clear in the months and years leading up to January 2025.

replies(1): >>45079407 #
mattmaroon ◴[] No.45079407[source]
The tariffs this time are far in excess of anything he did previously or promised to do while running for office again and took nearly everyone by surprise though.
replies(2): >>45079501 #>>45080487 #
jibal ◴[] No.45080487[source]
It didn't take informed people by surprise. We still see people denying that Trump had anything to do with Project 2025, whereas honest informed people knew that he very much did.
replies(1): >>45081844 #
mattmaroon ◴[] No.45081844[source]
Nobody informed saw massive tariffs on India, Brazil, etc. If you were right the stock market wouldn’t have tanked because the smart money would have priced it in.
replies(2): >>45082907 #>>45086982 #
cmurf ◴[] No.45086982[source]
Trump’s style of governing is patrimonialism. Mafia. It’s how he ran his businesses, and Trump 1.0. It’s entirely predictable that he’d go much further this time around as he claimed DOJ should act as his personal law firm.

Modi pissed Trump off by refusing to support a nomination for him to get the Nobel. And Trump hit India with tariffs. Unsurprising to anyone paying attention.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/30/us/politics/trump-modi-in...

No one is so stupid they can’t follow this, and predict the aggregate consequence well in advance.

It’s only by willfully suspending rationality, that people convinced themselves the obvious wouldn’t happen. And one of those is an insistence that the only valid form of prediction is at an absurd level of prediction granularity, rather than the inevitable storyline as a consequence of Trump’s intrinsic corruption and ability to corrupt everyone around him (or else they discarded and flung far away).

Trump is famously a racist, a rapist, a felon, and a vile insurrectionist. Nothing good could possibly have followed his election. Indeed, we’re really lucky so far. It’s going to get much worse.

tl;dr Elect an abuser, get abused.

replies(1): >>45092878 #
1. ◴[] No.45092878{3}[source]