←back to thread

462 points JumpCrisscross | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
lazarus01 ◴[] No.45078568[source]
In NYC, for the first 6 months of 2025, 994 new private sector jobs were created [1]. During the same period last year, there were 66,000 new jobs created.

Higher cost of doing business from tariffs has frozen hiring. With a frozen job market, there’s less revenue coming in.

NYC is a leading indicator for the rest of the country.

[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/13/nyregion/nyc-jobs.html

replies(13): >>45078595 #>>45078679 #>>45078740 #>>45078958 #>>45079382 #>>45080115 #>>45080271 #>>45080965 #>>45081316 #>>45082066 #>>45083020 #>>45083528 #>>45083540 #
macintux ◴[] No.45078595[source]
I’m curious whether it’s more the tariffs, or the uncertainty. No one knows what will happen on a day-to-day basis: the chaotic (and illegal) decision-making leaves everyone wondering what’s next.
replies(4): >>45078705 #>>45081223 #>>45082312 #>>45091612 #
YZF ◴[] No.45078705[source]
The hiring slowdown predates tariffs. For various reasons CEOs either believe they can do more with less people, or that they can hire cheaper people in other geographies, or both. Businesses (tech or financials) don't seem to be telegraphing uncertainty, S&P 500 revenue is at all times high and trending up, earnings/profit all time highs and trending up, valuations all times high and trending up.
replies(6): >>45079312 #>>45079399 #>>45079547 #>>45081230 #>>45082541 #>>45084035 #
vkou ◴[] No.45079312[source]
> The hiring slowdown predates tariffs.

That's true, but it didn't predate the election of a man who has made his understanding of tariffs and economics crystal clear in the months and years leading up to January 2025.

replies(1): >>45079407 #
mattmaroon ◴[] No.45079407[source]
The tariffs this time are far in excess of anything he did previously or promised to do while running for office again and took nearly everyone by surprise though.
replies(2): >>45079501 #>>45080487 #
denismi ◴[] No.45079501[source]
This pre-election BBC summary - https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwy343z53l1o - pretty clearly spells out what has eventuated, describing it as a "central campaign pledge":

> Trump has made tariffs a central campaign pledge in order to protect US industry. He has proposed new 10-20% tariffs on most imported foreign goods, and much higher ones on those from China.

replies(2): >>45079573 #>>45081304 #
trebligdivad ◴[] No.45079573[source]
I don't think there's that much surprise at the tariffs on China; it's the tariffs on the rest of the world, especially friendly countries like Canada that are the big surprises. Also, who believes politicians campaign pledges?
replies(4): >>45080256 #>>45080562 #>>45081115 #>>45083931 #
verzali ◴[] No.45081115[source]
Why on Earth not? Didn't people pay attention during his first term? This was 100% predictable.
replies(1): >>45082684 #
macintux ◴[] No.45082684[source]
The key difference seems to be that this time:

* Groups like Project 2025 spent years preparing an assault on our legal system

* This time Trump populated his administration with sycophants from day 1, instead of starting out with establishment figures

* The GOP has spent the last 8 years reconfiguring themselves into supplication

This time, Trump is fully unhinged and unfettered, and he knows the legal peril he faces if the White House isn’t GOP-held for the rest of his life.

replies(2): >>45083363 #>>45089110 #
1. southernplaces7 ◴[] No.45089110[source]
>and he knows the legal peril he faces if the White House isn’t GOP-held for the rest of his life.

This combined with the utter self-emasculation of the Republican Party to Trump's incoherent, or at best self-serving, garbage is the most worrisome thing of all.