←back to thread

215 points XzetaU8 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
ACCount37 ◴[] No.45081066[source]
Aging isn't even recognized as a disease yet, and it well should be.

Very little research currently goes into attacking aging directly - as opposed to handling things that are in no small part downstream from aging, such as heart disease. A big reason for poor "longevity gains" is lack of trying.

replies(4): >>45081119 #>>45081270 #>>45081570 #>>45081608 #
Kinrany ◴[] No.45081608[source]
Aging itself is not a disease, it's just stuff falling into disrepair over time.

Age-related illnesses shouldn't be dismissed with "they're just old" of course but there's no reason to expect a single cause. Other than passage of time itself.

replies(1): >>45081667 #
ACCount37 ◴[] No.45081667[source]
Cancer is "stuff falling into disrepair over time" too. Get enough faulty cells with DNA damage and one of them is going to make itself a problem. The only way to avoid cancer is to have something else kill you before you get it.

That's not a reason to say that cancer is somehow "not a disease". It obviously is. We don't want cancer. We fund efforts to research cancer and funnel money into better cancer treatments, and we get results.

Aging should get the same treatment.

replies(2): >>45081991 #>>45083717 #
1. Kinrany ◴[] No.45083717[source]
Cancer at least has a shared mechanism at the level of human biology.