←back to thread

462 points JumpCrisscross | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Refreeze5224 ◴[] No.45079571[source]
[flagged]
replies(7): >>45079637 #>>45079639 #>>45079766 #>>45080078 #>>45080308 #>>45080429 #>>45083035 #
dismalaf ◴[] No.45079639[source]
The system that allows very wealthy to exist is also the reason the US has the highest class mobility among western nations.

Also, on a purely pragmatic note, capital is mobile. If you penalize the rich, they just move, and then the new system will stop class mobility.

replies(7): >>45079660 #>>45079673 #>>45079677 #>>45079769 #>>45079995 #>>45080147 #>>45081210 #
jkestner ◴[] No.45079673[source]

  the US has the highest class mobility among western nations
Source? The rankings I see have the US behind most of Europe.
replies(3): >>45079723 #>>45079813 #>>45079999 #
monero-xmr ◴[] No.45079723[source]
The average European is poorer than the average person from Mississippi, the US’ poorest state. It isn’t even comparable
replies(4): >>45079819 #>>45079855 #>>45080455 #>>45082952 #
1. sensanaty ◴[] No.45082952{3}[source]
"Poorer" in what aspect(s), exactly? Because not everything is about gross monetary amounts when it comes to a good life. Even the poorest of the European nations (never mind that EU !== Europe, and that by invoking Europe you're also talking about the countries with the highest QoLs in the entire world like the Scandinavians) still have superior worker protections & medical infrastructure that doesn't leave the poor in generational debt than the US, which for me both rank infinitely higher than earning more money. I'm sure the poor Mississippians wouldn't mind some of those 30+ paid vacation days my Spanish friends get in exchange for earning a bit less.