←back to thread

215 points XzetaU8 | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.016s | source
Show context
ACCount37 ◴[] No.45081066[source]
Aging isn't even recognized as a disease yet, and it well should be.

Very little research currently goes into attacking aging directly - as opposed to handling things that are in no small part downstream from aging, such as heart disease. A big reason for poor "longevity gains" is lack of trying.

replies(4): >>45081119 #>>45081270 #>>45081570 #>>45081608 #
sdeframond ◴[] No.45081570[source]
I wonder if I would really like to pour billions of taxpayer money into aging when we are not even able to live a basic healthy lifestyle.

Sleeping well, eating well and exercising does work. Science about this is well-established. So why arent we?

It would not raise the life expectancy to 100 years but it would considerably reduce the health burden on the economy.

replies(3): >>45081828 #>>45081834 #>>45085258 #
ACCount37 ◴[] No.45081834[source]
Doesn't scale. If you could put "sleeping well, eating well and exercising" into a $0.25 once a week pill and make that available to everyone, it would work. As is, it doesn't.

We want solutions that can be scaled and rolled out broadly, and "basic healthy lifestyle" ain't it.

replies(1): >>45082459 #
sdeframond ◴[] No.45082459[source]
Why not? What is not scalable about it, specifically ?

I mean, sure, it doesn't scale as well as a magic pill as a business. But is certainly is O(n) with the number of people involved.

replies(3): >>45082697 #>>45082795 #>>45083087 #
1. ACCount37 ◴[] No.45082795{3}[source]
The kind of solution that scales as "O(n) effect with the number of people involved", but isn't broadly implemented? It's usually at least O(n log n) on the effort required to actually involve those people. This vital input is the source of piss poor scaling in practice.

Why? Because there's a massive variation in people. Everyone who finds it "very easy" to as much as "sleep well, eat well and exercise" already does just that, and the implementation difficulty ramp up gets brutal quickly. It's simple to suggest and hard to execute.

Pharmaceutics are so valuable because they offer good sublinear scaling on many of the inputs. They're extremely hard to develop, but they're often well worth it, because the implementation scales in a way those "simple" solutions don't.

replies(1): >>45084921 #
2. sdeframond ◴[] No.45084921[source]
Pharmaceutics are so valuable because they can be sold.

A healthy lifestyle must be earned. It is a constant struggle against the fastfood industry.

Soon you'll see Coca-cola or Nestlé [0] selling both very unhealthy quasi-addictive food and drinks to kids and magic pills that cure obesity. Sounds scalable enough ?

[0] https://www.nestle.com/brands/healthcare-nutrition/medical-n...

replies(1): >>45087797 #
3. ACCount37 ◴[] No.45087797[source]
Miss me with that "must be earned" bullshit.

If you think that being healthy should be a reward for a lifestyle of virtue, that's your problem, not mine. I'd rather have an actual solution than a blanket "those people don't struggle hard enough", pointed at the majority of US population that's overweight.

replies(1): >>45090025 #
4. sdeframond ◴[] No.45090025{3}[source]
Yes that's correct, we can't just expect people to lead that struggle alone.

How about some regulation in the F&B industry? Reducing screen time at school? Those can be done now and don't really cost much.

And then make our cities pedestrian and bicycle friendly. More difficult but definitely a win.

Or would you rather pour billions hoping for a magic pill that solves it all? This is not realistic.