←back to thread

Are we decentralized yet?

(arewedecentralizedyet.online)
487 points Bogdanp | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
INTPenis ◴[] No.45077453[source]
We're more decentralized in fedi but we're also not really consistent either. Which I think is the number one gripe for users who manage to get into the fedi.

I don't mind, I still think it's a huge leap forward, but it's important to set realistic expectations.

replies(2): >>45077542 #>>45121194 #
kace91 ◴[] No.45077542[source]
What do you mean by consistent?

(Never used the fediverse, so zero context here).

replies(1): >>45077886 #
skybrian ◴[] No.45077886[source]
Not who you're replying to, but one issue is that different users will sometimes see a different subset of replies to a post, depending on what the server they're using has copied from other servers.
replies(1): >>45078071 #
alethic ◴[] No.45078071[source]
This isn't correct. Mastodon merged fetch-all-replies in March. https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/pull/32615

The only difference in visible replies is in the moderation choices of the server the post is viewed from.

replies(3): >>45078107 #>>45078133 #>>45081945 #
1. INTPenis ◴[] No.45081945[source]
Yes but it's off by default for a reason, it's not realistic to expect every node to fetch all messages.

This is a catch 22 because the reason fedi is more decentralized is because of the low barrier of entry to run a node, but at the same time that low barrier means it takes less resources because it does not fetch every single message and piece of media.

replies(1): >>45095217 #
2. alethic ◴[] No.45095217[source]
It's currently on on the flagship instance and will be on by default in the upcoming 4.5 release.
replies(1): >>45135673 #
3. INTPenis ◴[] No.45135673[source]
Creating more monolithic centralization.

Us small instances can't afford it.