←back to thread

Are we decentralized yet?

(arewedecentralizedyet.online)
487 points Bogdanp | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
d4mi3n ◴[] No.45077410[source]
Neat! I'm not surprised at the findings here. BlueSky (for the average user) is pretty much a drop in replacement for Twitter.

Despite the smaller total numbers in Mastadon, it's great to see that the ecosystem seems to be successfully avoiding centralization like we've seen in the AT-Proto ecosystem.

I suspect that the cost of running AT proto servers/relays is prohibitive for smaller players compared to a Mastadon server selectively syndicating with a few peers, but I say this with only a vague understanding of the internals of both of these ecosystems.

replies(6): >>45077507 #>>45077986 #>>45078151 #>>45078889 #>>45079652 #>>45080382 #
dom96 ◴[] No.45078889[source]
> BlueSky (for the average user) is pretty much a drop in replacement for Twitter.

One reason Bluesky is so successful is because it doesn't shove decentralisation into the user's face like Mastodon does. The vast majority of people don't know what decentralisation is and don't care to.

I think that far too much effort is put into decentralisation and not enough into good moderation on these platforms.

replies(4): >>45079147 #>>45079477 #>>45079720 #>>45083128 #
N_Lens ◴[] No.45079147[source]
Moderation is definitely Fediverse’s weakness.
replies(3): >>45079321 #>>45079481 #>>45080843 #
1. verdverm ◴[] No.45079321[source]
https://roost.tools is working on open-source options for both social (fedi or not) and beyond social. Generally the idea is that we can fight the bad things better if we are working together instead of independently

ATProto's Stacked Moderation is an interesting approach to combine platform, community, and user level choices

https://bsky.social/about/blog/03-12-2024-stackable-moderati...