←back to thread

504 points Terretta | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
NitpickLawyer ◴[] No.45066063[source]
Tested this yesterday with Cline. It's fast, works well with agentic flows, and produces decent code. No idea why this thread is so negative (also got flagged while I was typing this?) but it's a decent model. I'd say it's at or above gpt5-mini level, which is awesome in my book (I've been maining gpt5-mini for a few weeks now, does the job on a budget).

Things I noted:

- It's fast. I tested it in EU tz, so ymmv

- It does agentic in an interesting way. Instead of editing a file whole or in many places, it does many small passes.

- Had a feature take ~110k tokens (parsing html w/ bs4). Still finished the task. Didn't notice any problems at high context.

- When things didn't work first try, it created a new file to test, did all the mocking / testing there, and then once it worked edited the main module file. Nice. GPT5-mini would often times edit working files, and then get confused and fail the task.

All in all, not bad. At the price point it's at, I could see it as a daily driver. Even agentic stuff w/ opus + gpt5 high as planners and this thing as an implementer. It's fast enough that it might be worth setting it up in parallel and basically replicate pass@x from research.

IMO it's good to have options at every level. Having many providers fight for the market is good, it keeps them on their toes, and brings prices down. GPT5-mini is at 2$/MTok, this is at 1.5$/MTok. This is basically "free", in the great scheme of things. I ndon't get the negativity.

replies(10): >>45066728 #>>45067116 #>>45067311 #>>45067436 #>>45067602 #>>45067936 #>>45068543 #>>45068653 #>>45068788 #>>45074597 #
jameshart ◴[] No.45067602[source]
If the Grok brand wasn’t terminally tarnished for you by the ‘mechahitler’ incident, I’m not sure what more it would take.

This is an offering being produced by a company whose idea of responsible AI use involves prompting a chatbot that “You spend a lot of time on 4chan, watching InfoWars videos” - https://www.404media.co/grok-exposes-underlying-prompts-for-...

A lot of people rightly don’t want any such thing anywhere near their code.

replies(16): >>45067741 #>>45067793 #>>45067834 #>>45067845 #>>45067876 #>>45067950 #>>45068178 #>>45068224 #>>45068385 #>>45068645 #>>45068805 #>>45068858 #>>45069087 #>>45069800 #>>45070448 #>>45071147 #
jwr[dead post] ◴[] No.45068178[source]
[flagged]
ribelo[dead post] ◴[] No.45068615[source]
[flagged]
gizzlon ◴[] No.45068662[source]
So in your view, the true victim of Elon's nazi salute was.. Elon?

How do you come to that conclusion? Because the backlash was "too much" ? He is still (one of) the richest people in the world, and controls several huuge companies. But he got his feelings hurt, I guess? And that was "too much" ?? Poor snowflake Elon.

replies(2): >>45068908 #>>45070074 #
ribelo ◴[] No.45068908[source]
Let's make this clear:

The Anti-Defamation League stated it wasn't a salute and that they weren't offended. Rabbi Ari Lamm wrote that Musk has repeatedly shown he's a friend to the Jewish community. David Greenfield suggested people should focus on actual antisemitism instead. Netanyahu highlighted the absurdity of the accusations and pointed to Musk's aid and engagement after the October 7th attacks.

And yes, Musk became a victim. I don't see what his current wealth has to do with it. It's hard to ignore the imbalance where one man drew the world's anger and became public enemy #1. If you call him a snowflake, I don't know what to call all those who might have been offended by his gesture

replies(7): >>45069097 #>>45069210 #>>45069296 #>>45069368 #>>45069524 #>>45069631 #>>45073326 #
maweaver ◴[] No.45069368[source]
I literally saw it on video. I don't care who tells me it didn't happen, it very clearly did.
replies(1): >>45070227 #
cpursley ◴[] No.45070227[source]
You saw what you wanted to see.
replies(1): >>45073382 #
KingMob ◴[] No.45073382{3}[source]
Pffft. Nobody wanted to see that, but he did it anyway.
replies(4): >>45073650 #>>45073665 #>>45073703 #>>45073802 #
1. ◴[] No.45073650{4}[source]