←back to thread

451 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.22s | source
Show context
keeganpoppen ◴[] No.45058084[source]
i will say that though i am predisposed to appreciate and agree with an article like this, any sort of value proposition around "some users don't want javascript" just doesn't... hit for me. and, mind you: i am a card-carrying arch user and have spent more time messing with browser scripting and web crawling, and am more of a True Believer than most. it's just such a niche user preference that i think it should largely be simply ignored. yes, i would love the world to be better for the "noscript" universe, no, i don't think that any individual "grassroots" effort should stake itself on "no javascript" being any part of its utility. i think there are a million other reasons why CSS should win out that are more compelling than an appeal to what feels, extremely ironically, like a callback to the "but 10% of your users use IE6" days... all in all, yes: this is somewhat of a minor point wrt. to the article (which btw i think is great), but i am just calling the "trend", such as it is / has been, for what (i think) it is.
replies(5): >>45058205 #>>45058259 #>>45058381 #>>45058464 #>>45059079 #
exabrial ◴[] No.45058464[source]
> some users dont want javascript

correct, nearly all dont

replies(1): >>45058481 #
dmd ◴[] No.45058481[source]
More than 99.9% of web users have never heard of javascript.
replies(3): >>45058581 #>>45059610 #>>45071213 #
1. LoganDark ◴[] No.45071213[source]
But then how could they want it? It wouldn't be like they want to get rid of it instead, they just wouldn't feel anything towards something they've never heard of.