Most active commenters
  • simoncion(5)
  • theshackleford(4)

←back to thread

520 points OlympicMarmoto | 23 comments | | HN request time: 0.626s | source | bottom
Show context
BiteCode_dev ◴[] No.45067060[source]
> they also got me reported to HR by the manager of the XROS effort for supposedly making his team members feel bad

This is madness. The safe space culture has really gone too far.

replies(8): >>45067191 #>>45067221 #>>45067225 #>>45067388 #>>45067537 #>>45067678 #>>45067808 #>>45075885 #
1. Inityx ◴[] No.45067225[source]
I'll offer a different interpretation:

If a professional can't give critical feedback in a professional setting without being rude or belittling others, then they need to improve their communication skills.

replies(4): >>45067597 #>>45067637 #>>45067754 #>>45067991 #
2. mariusor ◴[] No.45067597[source]
From what you know of Carmack, does "can't give critical feedback in a professional setting without being rude or belittling others" sound like him to you? It does not to me, though granted maybe he's different in his non public persona than what you can see in presentations and talks.
replies(1): >>45067958 #
3. fatbird ◴[] No.45067637[source]
This.

Being "reported to HR" doesn't mean "almost got fired". It likely meant a meeting where someone explained "hey, the way you communicated that caused some upset, let's discuss better ways to handle that situation next time." Very often in larger companies, complaints about things like "this bigwig from this other group jumped all over us" are automatically sent through HR because HR has staff whose job just is resolving conflicts between people and keeping things peaceful.

replies(1): >>45071430 #
4. BiteCode_dev ◴[] No.45067754[source]
Having worked in the valley, I've seen what critical feedback meant in many companies there, and it removes all usefulness of the info because there is a ceiling of what is socially acceptable to say; therefore, you can't know how bad or urgent things are.

Everything is ASAP. They are super excited about everything. And nothing you do is wrong, it just could be improved or they like it but don't love it.

You don't know if something is important, basically.

Just like Louis CK said, "if you used 'amazing' on chicken nuggets, what are you going to say when your first child is born?". But in reverse.

Personally, I'd rather work with someone who would tell me my work is terrible if it is.

In Germany, you can't even legally say somebody did a bad job at your company in a recommendation letter. Companies created a whole subtext to workaround that, it's crazy.

Some things are just bad. You should be able to say it is. Not by saying it could be better. Not by using euphemism. It's just something that needs to go to the trash.

In fact, I don't trust people who can't receive this information, even if not packaged with tact (which you should attempt to, but life happens). If you can't handle people not being perfectly polite every time, I can't help but feel I won't be able to count on you when things get hard.

That must be the French in me talking.

replies(3): >>45070131 #>>45070514 #>>45070950 #
5. ◴[] No.45067958[source]
6. amarant ◴[] No.45067991[source]
This is not that though. This is just developers being unable to handle constructive criticism, and when they can't win the argument on merits, went for the HR option. It happens.

I've had it happen to me too, but my response was to resign on the spot (I was already not satisfied with the company).

The "toxic behaviour" I had done? I reverted a commit on the master branch that didn't compile, and sent a slack to the Dev who had committed it saying "hi! There appears to have been a mistake in your latest commit, could you please check it out and fix it? I've reverted it in the meantime since I need to deploy this other feature"

The dev responded by force pushing the code that did not compile to master and contacted HR.

I decided there was greener grass on other pastures. I was right.

replies(2): >>45069261 #>>45070653 #
7. cjbgkagh ◴[] No.45069261[source]
When I started breaking the build would end up with the person who did it having to wear the dunce hat for the day. This was before git so there are now fewer excuses for breaking the build today.
8. 1718627440 ◴[] No.45070131[source]
> In Germany, you can't even legally say somebody did a bad job at your company in a recommendation letter. Companies created a whole subtext to workaround that, it's crazy.

I don't think it's just about legality. Whether the recommendation letter is included in the application is at the distinction of the applicant. When you want it to reach the next company, you must write is so, that the former employee considers it to be a good recommendation.

replies(1): >>45072346 #
9. qaq ◴[] No.45070514[source]
I am with you on this. Worked in our Dublin office was so refreshing to have straight up communication vs whatever the song and dance we do here in US.
10. tom_ ◴[] No.45070653[source]
Carmack says he can't post the actual discussion, but clearly you have access to it - can you post it?
replies(1): >>45071398 #
11. emmelaich ◴[] No.45070950[source]
I'd just quote Mourinho / Carlsen. "If I say anything I'm in big trouble".
12. simoncion ◴[] No.45071398{3}[source]
Even if that didn't violate NDAs & etc, that would be super rude. You realize that, right?
replies(3): >>45071524 #>>45071559 #>>45074125 #
13. simoncion ◴[] No.45071430[source]
FWIW, it can also mean a meeting where HR says to the complainer: "Are you good, dude? Why are you complaining about this? This is perfectly normal workplace behavior. Stop wasting our time."
14. ◴[] No.45071524{4}[source]
15. theshackleford ◴[] No.45071559{4}[source]
It’s also super rude to make claims as to what occurred and why in any situation you yourself were not privy to or involved in but I don’t see you rushing in with the same vigour to point that out.
replies(1): >>45071597 #
16. simoncion ◴[] No.45071597{5}[source]
> It’s also super rude to make claims as to what occurred and why in any situation you yourself were not privy to or involved in...

Do you know that that's what's going on here?

replies(1): >>45071927 #
17. theshackleford ◴[] No.45071927{6}[source]
Yes. Seems pretty clear from the post to me that they are making assumptions based on a similar event in their past, not that they were involved first hand in this event.
replies(1): >>45073475 #
18. pjmlp ◴[] No.45072346{3}[source]
It is, as Portuguese it surprised me a lot.

First of all, in southern countries we hardly do recommendation letters, if we do they usually ended up being written by ourselves and if the company agrees with the content, it gets signed.

Exactly because of this, you are supposed to give referrals that then talk whatever they feel like about the experience working with you was all about.

Having a whole legal process for recommendation letters, that have created a whole industry of hidden language that looks good on the surface but tells exactly otherwise, was a surprise to me.

https://www.betriebsrat.de/news/arbeitnehmer/achtung-arbeits...

https://www.zeugnisprofi.com/wissen/arbeitszeugnis-geheimcod...

https://www.orizon.de/de/karriereratgeber/arbeitszeugnis-ver...

Just some examples, there are lawyers that analyse recommendation letters as one of their services.

19. simoncion ◴[] No.45073475{7}[source]
>> Do you know that that's what's going on here?

> Yes. Seems pretty clear from the post to me that they are making assumptions...

So you don't know what's going on; you're assuming. Cool.

replies(1): >>45079204 #
20. tom_ ◴[] No.45074125{4}[source]
Yes, of course. The point of my heavy-handed post was to try to find out what is actually going on here. Does this person have any insider info? Or are they (as many are in the discussion, and as I suspect is the case here too - but I am going only on the balance of probabilities!) just using this as an opportunity to relate this to their own grievances, so they can discuss those?

We've only got one side of this particular story, we don't know what happened from the other person's point of view, we don't know what form this HR complaint took - or any of the other details. We can bet, just as I did in my last paragraph, but in my view the odds are more questionable and the topic more likely end up as unproductive venting. Any good comments will get lost.

Still, it's also true that the link is just there as a starting point for discussion, and the discussion can take any forms that the readership would find interesting.

21. theshackleford ◴[] No.45079204{8}[source]
> So you don't know what's going on; you're assuming. Cool.

Incorrect. Their post makes it clear they were not involved in their own words. It's called reading comprehension.

replies(1): >>45080407 #
22. simoncion ◴[] No.45080407{9}[source]
> It's called reading comprehension.

Right back at you.

replies(1): >>45087508 #
23. theshackleford ◴[] No.45087508{10}[source]
Yes, except I’ve already displayed I’m capable of it whilst you have displayed only the opposite.