←back to thread

650 points clcaev | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
metaphor ◴[] No.45063162[source]
> Immediately after the wreck at 9:14 p.m. on April 25, 2019, the crucial data detailing how it unfolded was automatically uploaded to the company’s servers and stored in a vast central database, according to court documents. Tesla’s headquarters soon sent an automated message back to the car confirming that it had received the collision snapshot.

> Moments later, court records show, the data was just as automatically “unlinked” from the 2019 Tesla Model S at the scene, meaning the local copy was marked for deletion, a standard practice for Teslas in such incidents, according to court testimony.

Wow...just wow.

replies(5): >>45063302 #>>45063632 #>>45063687 #>>45063980 #>>45064115 #
raincole ◴[] No.45063632[source]
The 'wow' part is that they deleted data from server. The part you quoted sounds like nothing unusual to me.
replies(1): >>45063732 #
lexicality ◴[] No.45063732[source]
You don't think it's unusual that the software is designed to delete crash data from the crashed car?
replies(3): >>45063809 #>>45063911 #>>45064066 #
foobarian ◴[] No.45063809[source]
Think of it as the scripts that run on CI/CD actions running unit tests. If a unit test fails, the test artifacts are uploaded to an artifact repository, and then, get this - the test runner instance is destroyed! But we don't think of that as unusual or nefarious.
replies(4): >>45063848 #>>45063858 #>>45063869 #>>45070944 #
1. smallpipe ◴[] No.45063858[source]
No one dies when your unit test fails. Different stakes, different practices, what are all the Tesla apologists smoking here?