←back to thread

440 points pseudolus | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
orochimaaru ◴[] No.45052894[source]
The study is bs. While executives are blaming AI, it is nowhere near levels of replacement.

What I bet is happening under the covers is reprioritization of work, offshoring or both.

replies(3): >>45052976 #>>45053267 #>>45057114 #
smt88 ◴[] No.45052976[source]
> What I bet is happening under the covers is reprioritization of work, offshoring or both.

AI has been frequently used as an explanation for layoffs.

Before AI, layoffs would be a positive signal to investors, but they'd be demoralizing to staff and/or harm the brand.

Now, you can say, "Wow, we're so good at technology, we're eliminated ___ jobs!" and try to get the best of both worlds.

replies(2): >>45053113 #>>45057130 #
1. coldpie ◴[] No.45053113[source]
My company did exactly this earlier in the year. It was a blatant lie and everyone who works here knew it. None of the people laid off were actually replaced with AI, the work they did was just eliminated.