←back to thread

440 points pseudolus | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.397s | source | bottom
1. orochimaaru ◴[] No.45052894[source]
The study is bs. While executives are blaming AI, it is nowhere near levels of replacement.

What I bet is happening under the covers is reprioritization of work, offshoring or both.

replies(3): >>45052976 #>>45053267 #>>45057114 #
2. smt88 ◴[] No.45052976[source]
> What I bet is happening under the covers is reprioritization of work, offshoring or both.

AI has been frequently used as an explanation for layoffs.

Before AI, layoffs would be a positive signal to investors, but they'd be demoralizing to staff and/or harm the brand.

Now, you can say, "Wow, we're so good at technology, we're eliminated ___ jobs!" and try to get the best of both worlds.

replies(2): >>45053113 #>>45057130 #
3. coldpie ◴[] No.45053113[source]
My company did exactly this earlier in the year. It was a blatant lie and everyone who works here knew it. None of the people laid off were actually replaced with AI, the work they did was just eliminated.
4. stonemetal12 ◴[] No.45053267[source]
Why bet? In the news recently Australian bank CBA was caught offshoring positions and claiming the jobs had been replaced by AI.
5. anthem2025 ◴[] No.45057114[source]
It’s also just natural cost cutting from businesses that were previously massively over hiring, and outside of AI don’t exactly have a ton of areas with huge growing investment.

Plus slashing jobs like this keeps the plebs in line. They don’t like software engineers having the money and job security to raise a stink over things. They want drones terrified of losing everything.

6. anthem2025 ◴[] No.45057130[source]
Yeah, unquestioning “journalists” have allowed them to turn laying off thousands into an ad for their new tech.