←back to thread

167 points lemonlym | 6 comments | | HN request time: 1.019s | source | bottom
Show context
FirmwareBurner ◴[] No.45052119[source]
I think everyone knew, even without looking at any data, that startups were in a bubble thanks to Covid, when every "shoeshine boy" was studying to be a webdev at a start-up.

Like how many food delivery apps that are actually profitable can the economy handle?

replies(2): >>45052249 #>>45053293 #
1. TylerE ◴[] No.45052249[source]
I think the real real giveaway is that like 90% there's a big exit, it's an aquihire and the "product" is quickly dumped.
replies(1): >>45052278 #
2. JCM9 ◴[] No.45052278[source]
Yep. Many / most aquihires are pretty ugly financially. While the headline sounds impressive (“X startup acquired for $250M”) the reality is that with preferred cap tables and terms most folks see nothing and investors are merely trying to recoup some losses or make a modest (less than S&P500 index fund return) return on investment. It’s basically a fire sale to salvage what’s left from the wreckage.

Founders might get a little something and most shareholder employees get nothing.

replies(1): >>45052621 #
3. nkingsy ◴[] No.45052621[source]
Don’t they usually get a better stock package than the average new hire?
replies(3): >>45054264 #>>45054378 #>>45054609 #
4. gdbsjjdn ◴[] No.45054264{3}[source]
In my experience what the founders usually get is a bigger locked up retention package. The investors want the cash, and the acquirer wants the founders to stay.
5. ◴[] No.45054378{3}[source]
6. mandevil ◴[] No.45054609{3}[source]
The employees along for the ride on an acquihire? Sometimes yes, sometimes no. Depends a lot on how generous the founder/target of the acquihire is.