←back to thread

449 points lemper | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.199s | source
Show context
benrutter ◴[] No.45036836[source]
> software quality doesn't appear because you have good developers. It's the end result of a process, and that process informs both your software development practices, but also your testing. Your management. Even your sales and servicing.

If you only take one thing away from this article, it should be this one! The Therac-25 incident is a horrifying and important part of software history, it's really easy to think type-systems, unit-testing and defensive-coding can solve all software problems. They definitely can help a lot, but the real failure in the story of the Therac-25 from my understanding, is that it took far too long for incidents to be reported, investigated and fixed.

There was a great Cautionary Tales podcast about the device recently[0], one thing mentioned was that, even aside from the catasrophic accidents, Therac-25 machines were routinely seen by users to show unexplained errors, but these issues never made it to the desk of someone who might fix it.

[0] https://timharford.com/2025/07/cautionary-tales-captain-kirk...

replies(13): >>45036898 #>>45037054 #>>45037090 #>>45037874 #>>45038109 #>>45038360 #>>45038467 #>>45038827 #>>45043421 #>>45044645 #>>45046867 #>>45046969 #>>45047517 #
ChrisMarshallNY ◴[] No.45038827[source]
I worked for a company that manufactured some of the highest-Quality photographic and scientific equipment that you can buy. It was expensive as hell, but our customers seemed to think it was worth it.

> It's the end result of a process

In my experience, it's even more than that. It's a culture.

replies(2): >>45038936 #>>45042622 #
franktankbank ◴[] No.45038936[source]
A culture of high-quality engineering, no doubt. Made up of: high quality engineers!
replies(4): >>45039171 #>>45039214 #>>45040858 #>>45044538 #
kulahan ◴[] No.45044538[source]
Unfortunately, software developers are the absolute most offensive use of the word "engineer", because 99.9% of the stuff this field makes is a competition to take the most unique approach to a solution, then getting it bandaged together with gum and paperclips.

If this industry wants to be respected, it should start trying to be actual engineers. There should be tons and tons of standards which are enforced legally, but this is not often the case. Imagine if there were no real legal guardrails in, say, bridge building!

edit: and imagine if any time you brought up this issue, bridge builders cockily responded with "well stuff seems to work fine so..."

replies(5): >>45044851 #>>45045578 #>>45048657 #>>45049963 #>>45120141 #
1. Cthulhu_ ◴[] No.45049963[source]
There are tons and tons of standards, some of which are enforced legally - you can't just supply software for the government, the military, banks, companies etc without certain certifications like ISO 9001, ISO/IEC 27001, etc

Now I'm not an engineer nor at all aware of what these standards actually mean, I'm sure they're pretty common sense and nowhere near as detailed as bridge building standards.