←back to thread

295 points AndrewDucker | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
andybak ◴[] No.45045278[source]
Between this and the UK Online Safety Bill, how are people meant to keep track?

Launch a small website and commit a felony in 7 states and 13 countries.

I wouldn't have known about the Mississippi bill unless I'd read this. How are we have to know?

replies(9): >>45045295 #>>45045350 #>>45045462 #>>45045802 #>>45047760 #>>45047928 #>>45048091 #>>45050064 #>>45054184 #
zaptheimpaler ◴[] No.45045350[source]
Any physical business has to deal with 100s of regulations too, it just means the same culture of making it extremely difficult and expensive to do anything at all is now coming to the online world as well, bit by bit.
replies(6): >>45045379 #>>45045609 #>>45046181 #>>45048858 #>>45048936 #>>45049135 #
trymas ◴[] No.45049135[source]
If you have a restaurant in Italy and some 18 year old from Mississippi orders a glass of wine - you can happily and lawfully serve it.

You don’t need to know all the laws of Mississippi to serve such customer, or any laws from anywhere else other than Italy.

replies(6): >>45049249 #>>45049272 #>>45049397 #>>45049472 #>>45055954 #>>45058289 #
dudefeliciano ◴[] No.45049272[source]
how would US jurisdiction be able to affect an Italian website that does not require ID for Missisipi residents?
replies(1): >>45049430 #
1. silverliver ◴[] No.45049430[source]
It wouldn't unless the US is willing to justify having their domestic companies fall under the jurisdiction of other countries. Geopolitical reciprocity is still alive an well as the US is starting to find out.