←back to thread

152 points xqcgrek2 | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.414s | source
Show context
iandanforth ◴[] No.45043708[source]
This is McCarthyism. You take a polarizing word, then you attack your enemies by claiming they are that thing, and couch the whole thing in an "investigation" whose outcome is predetermined.

There is no merit to discussing if the target is that thing, it doesn't matter. It's an ideological attack. If you take it on its face then the attackers win because you're treating them as if they were honest participants in a discussion, which they are not.

And remember even if the investigation (which is a farce) goes nowhere, allowing it to exist unchallenged means that some people are going to be harassed and intimidated. But, that too is the point, fear is what they want.

replies(9): >>45043799 #>>45043943 #>>45044019 #>>45044141 #>>45044186 #>>45044853 #>>45045770 #>>45047416 #>>45047503 #
1. throw0101c ◴[] No.45045770[source]
> This is McCarthyism.

You say this like it's a bad thing, and some think it would be a good thing:

> “Joseph McCarthy was right,” Loomer responded without missing a beat. “We need to make McCarthy great again.”

* https://archive.ph/https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/arch...

> During the second presidency of Donald Trump, Loomer emerged as an influential actor, using her social media platform to call for the firing of officials she deems insufficiently loyal to Trump. In early April 2025, reports emerged that Loomer influenced President Trump to dismiss more than half a dozen national security officials due to her suspicions of their disloyalty to him and advocated for additional firings.[13]

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Loomer

replies(1): >>45047969 #
2. dazed_confused ◴[] No.45047969[source]
It is a bad thing and anyone who thinks otherwise is acting in bad faith.