←back to thread

360 points danielmorozoff | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ckemere ◴[] No.45035120[source]
I think that the negativity here is unfortunate. The reality is that it’s very hard to see a normal VC level return on the $100M+ Elon and friends have invested here. And don’t let anyone fool you - this is the fundamental reason the BCI field has moved slowly.

If Neuralink proceeds to a scenario where quadriplegic patients can get reliable (ie lifelong) control of their computers for less than $100k that will be a huge win for them for a cost that no one else was willing to pay.

To be clear, at that order of magnitude they might make back their investment, but it won’t be 10x or 100x, and the potential healthy-brain-connected-to-the-AI play is much less rooted in reality than Teslas all becoming taxis.

Worst case scenario is that Elon loses interest and pulls the plug and Mr Arbaugh loses continued tech support a la a google product. I think that’s the one question I wish the author had asked…

replies(14): >>45035214 #>>45035665 #>>45035718 #>>45036739 #>>45037140 #>>45037901 #>>45038149 #>>45038255 #>>45038321 #>>45038387 #>>45038811 #>>45040093 #>>45043135 #>>45043220 #
rc5150 ◴[] No.45035214[source]
The unfortunate part is that your first thought went to return on investment rather than the humanitarian angle, which I think is the common perspective; optics and money.

Then there's the pessimists, like me, wondering how long it'll take to Neuralink to turn their army of computer connected paraplegics into some Mechanical Turk-esque Grok clean up.

replies(8): >>45035425 #>>45036180 #>>45036455 #>>45036527 #>>45036672 #>>45037703 #>>45038903 #>>45042396 #
SV_BubbleTime[dead post] ◴[] No.45035425[source]
[flagged]
bluefirebrand ◴[] No.45035519[source]
Things have costs so we should be ok with a society where the wealthy exploit poor and desperate people?
replies(6): >>45035595 #>>45035629 #>>45035659 #>>45035885 #>>45036391 #>>45036561 #
TheDong ◴[] No.45035629[source]
This is the forum for a VC-funded startup accelerator, so yes, the implicit belief you hold if you're posting here is supposed to be "VCs deserve money, i.e. the wealthy deserve more wealth, and I will help them get there".

It's not exactly the same as "so we should exploit the poor and desperate", but that is one of the pitches VCs like the most.

replies(1): >>45042598 #
1. salawat ◴[] No.45042598[source]
I want to say the answer to this is "not all lurkers/posters", because at this point I'm more treating this place as an early warning system for how the hellhole dystopia will come about.

The amount of self-censoring I've ramped up to to keep anything useful from amoral VC's though does appear to prove your point though.