←back to thread

F-35 pilot held 50-minute airborne conference call with engineers before crash

(www.cnn.com)
278 points Michelangelo11 | 2 comments | 27 Aug 25 11:38 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
preisschild ◴[27 Aug 25 11:53 UTC] No.45038390[source]▶
But why was there water in the hydraulic system in the first place?
replies(4): >>45038480 #>>45038515 #>>45038537 #>>45038678 #
grumpy-de-sre ◴[27 Aug 25 12:08 UTC] No.45038537[source]▶
Likely contamination of ground handling equipment [1]. Unfortunately can happen. I wonder if the hydraulic fluid is hygroscopic or something?

1. https://www.pacaf.af.mil/Portals/6/documents/3_AIB%20Report....

replies(4): >>45038600 #>>45038679 #>>45039864 #>>45040818 #
4gotunameagain ◴[27 Aug 25 12:13 UTC] No.45038600[source]▶
Hydraulic brake fluid is glycol ether based and hygroscopic. Planes usually use mineral based fluids which are not, but heck if I know what the F-35 uses.
replies(1): >>45038659 #
grumpy-de-sre ◴[27 Aug 25 12:19 UTC] No.45038659[source]▶
Quoting ChatGPT (and after a quick sanity check),

The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter uses a specialized hydraulic fluid that’s based on a synthetic ester formulation, not a petroleum-based fluid.

Specifically, it uses phosphate ester–based fire-resistant hydraulic fluid (commonly in the MIL-PRF-83282 or newer MIL-PRF-87257 class).

Apparently the older phosphate-ester based hydraulic fluids were hygroscopic but I'm not sure if the newer variants are.

replies(3): >>45038765 #>>45038817 #>>45040169 #
1. Workaccount2 ◴[27 Aug 25 14:24 UTC] No.45040169{3}[source]▶
Yes, lets condition people to never reveal they used ChatGPT. Even though the response seems accurate.

[1]https://hiigroupasia.com/f-35-aviation-ground-support-equipm...

replies(1): >>45040502 #
2. grumpy-de-sre ◴[27 Aug 25 14:49 UTC] No.45040502[source]▶
Yeh the sanity check involved researching the milspecs listed and the connection to the F35 program.