←back to thread

278 points Michelangelo11 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Molitor5901 ◴[] No.45038583[source]
Considering they relieved a pilot of command for ejecting when his F-35 become unresponsive, now they make them sit on conference calls. That pilot is very brave, I think others would have ejected by now. Making them fly around up there is ridiculous.
replies(4): >>45039343 #>>45039426 #>>45039456 #>>45039485 #
5f3cfa1a ◴[] No.45039343[source]
Ejecting from an airplane is no joke: 18g of force leaves 20-30% with spinal fractures, and ejection seats have an 8% mortality rate[1]

It seems to me that continuing flight with inoperative/damaged landing gear while you discuss alternatives with engineers is the safest option. Burn fuel, make a plan, let people on the ground mobilize to help, and eject when you've tried what you can and it truly becomes the safest option.

[1]: https://sites.nd.edu/biomechanics-in-the-wild/2021/04/06/top...

replies(2): >>45039577 #>>45039587 #
1. jajko ◴[] No.45039587[source]
Any military pilot has what, 2 or max 3 ejections even in best case scenario before they have to be retired due to medical reasons? If given army lets them actually fly another one.

Its the last resort, lesser of 2 evils situation, not some cool trick hollywood may make you believe.