←back to thread

360 points danielmorozoff | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ckemere ◴[] No.45035120[source]
I think that the negativity here is unfortunate. The reality is that it’s very hard to see a normal VC level return on the $100M+ Elon and friends have invested here. And don’t let anyone fool you - this is the fundamental reason the BCI field has moved slowly.

If Neuralink proceeds to a scenario where quadriplegic patients can get reliable (ie lifelong) control of their computers for less than $100k that will be a huge win for them for a cost that no one else was willing to pay.

To be clear, at that order of magnitude they might make back their investment, but it won’t be 10x or 100x, and the potential healthy-brain-connected-to-the-AI play is much less rooted in reality than Teslas all becoming taxis.

Worst case scenario is that Elon loses interest and pulls the plug and Mr Arbaugh loses continued tech support a la a google product. I think that’s the one question I wish the author had asked…

replies(14): >>45035214 #>>45035665 #>>45035718 #>>45036739 #>>45037140 #>>45037901 #>>45038149 #>>45038255 #>>45038321 #>>45038387 #>>45038811 #>>45040093 #>>45043135 #>>45043220 #
maxlin ◴[] No.45035665[source]
Companies like this going under is a horror story for the patients I've seen playing out a few times. But I honestly can't see something as public and well-funded having the same fate. "Elon Musk losing interest" isn't really something I see likely as he doesn't function in the money-oriented ways pretty much almost all other billionaire-types do. He loves the tech and the ideals, and Neuralink is past the point of ever being potentially a dud
replies(4): >>45036292 #>>45036882 #>>45037031 #>>45037534 #
LunaSea ◴[] No.45036882[source]
> isn't really something I see likely as he doesn't function in the money-oriented ways pretty much almost all other billionaire-types do

Is that why he sued to obtain his $29B package from Tesla shareholders?

replies(4): >>45037476 #>>45039472 #>>45046195 #>>45055372 #
1. plqbfbv ◴[] No.45039472{3}[source]
> Is that why he sued to obtain his $29B package from Tesla shareholders?

I think you're confused on two sort-of-related things: one is the $56B package agreed to and approved in 2018 that a judge decided to revoke, for that he's suing.

The other one is the relatively recent (July/August) $29B package that was created by two indipendent board advisors to give him a "salary" (he did not participate or vote on the creation of this package), since apparently he received nothing from Tesla for the past 6-7 years. This comes as a result of him expressing that if he wants more control over the company, or he's going to build things (AI, robotics) outside of it. Part of the deal is that he's to forfeit this if the ruling on the 2018 package is in his favor.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_lawsuits_involving_Tes...

https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulat...

https://techcrunch.com/2025/08/04/tesla-hands-29b-comp-packa...