←back to thread

Scientist exposes anti-wind groups as oil-funded, now they want to silence him

(electrek.co)
542 points xbmcuser | 1 comments | 27 Aug 25 06:49 UTC | HN request time: 0.222s | source
Show context
flanked-evergl[dead post] ◴[27 Aug 25 10:38 UTC] No.45037789[source]▶
[flagged]
imglorp ◴[27 Aug 25 10:45 UTC] No.45037841[source]▶
We can have plenty of both.
replies(1): >>45037871 #
flanked-evergl ◴[27 Aug 25 10:50 UTC] No.45037871[source]▶
We don't need both. We actually just need nuclear, and no amount of throwing away my tax money on wind boondoggles will change that. The Norwegian Labour Party royally screwed the Norwegians with wind, they had to make all other energy much more expensive to make wind feasible, and wind is still not feasible, everything else is just ungodly expensive with 5% monthly inflation on food.
replies(3): >>45038247 #>>45038562 #>>45041943 #
1. zekrioca ◴[27 Aug 25 11:37 UTC] No.45038247[source]▶
Your arguments are not coming from evidence, but from emotions. You clearly want politics as usual, with investments in a very expensive theoretical “one size fits all”, or all eggs in one nest types of solutions. You don’t even list the pros and cons of your statements. This is really bad advising.