←back to thread

360 points danielmorozoff | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ckemere ◴[] No.45035120[source]
I think that the negativity here is unfortunate. The reality is that it’s very hard to see a normal VC level return on the $100M+ Elon and friends have invested here. And don’t let anyone fool you - this is the fundamental reason the BCI field has moved slowly.

If Neuralink proceeds to a scenario where quadriplegic patients can get reliable (ie lifelong) control of their computers for less than $100k that will be a huge win for them for a cost that no one else was willing to pay.

To be clear, at that order of magnitude they might make back their investment, but it won’t be 10x or 100x, and the potential healthy-brain-connected-to-the-AI play is much less rooted in reality than Teslas all becoming taxis.

Worst case scenario is that Elon loses interest and pulls the plug and Mr Arbaugh loses continued tech support a la a google product. I think that’s the one question I wish the author had asked…

replies(14): >>45035214 #>>45035665 #>>45035718 #>>45036739 #>>45037140 #>>45037901 #>>45038149 #>>45038255 #>>45038321 #>>45038387 #>>45038811 #>>45040093 #>>45043135 #>>45043220 #
rc5150 ◴[] No.45035214[source]
The unfortunate part is that your first thought went to return on investment rather than the humanitarian angle, which I think is the common perspective; optics and money.

Then there's the pessimists, like me, wondering how long it'll take to Neuralink to turn their army of computer connected paraplegics into some Mechanical Turk-esque Grok clean up.

replies(8): >>45035425 #>>45036180 #>>45036455 #>>45036527 #>>45036672 #>>45037703 #>>45038903 #>>45042396 #
SV_BubbleTime[dead post] ◴[] No.45035425[source]
[flagged]
bluefirebrand ◴[] No.45035519{3}[source]
Things have costs so we should be ok with a society where the wealthy exploit poor and desperate people?
replies(6): >>45035595 #>>45035629 #>>45035659 #>>45035885 #>>45036391 #>>45036561 #
1. orbital-decay ◴[] No.45035659{4}[source]
The supposedly cynical comment above talks about giving quadriplegic people a reliable way to control computers for <$100k, something that was science fiction before. Is this what you call exploitation of the poor and desperate by the wealthy? You have to finance things somehow, or they won't be done at all.
replies(2): >>45035742 #>>45036269 #
2. orbital-decay ◴[] No.45035770[source]
As much as I dislike (current) Musk, the comment I'm responding to clearly wasn't about that. Do you see this work being done by anyone else? I don't. And yes, it has the potential to turn dystopian, sure. Don't let it. I don't know how some people manage to see everything as strictly black and white.

Being called a bot was unexpected, to put it mildly.

3. p_v_doom ◴[] No.45036269[source]
There are many ways to finance this without strapping a parasite to leech off of it on top
replies(1): >>45048518 #
4. lmm ◴[] No.45048518[source]
Are those many ways to finance it in the room with us right now?
replies(1): >>45052690 #
5. SV_BubbleTime ◴[] No.45052690{3}[source]
See “all the right things to do haven’t been tried yet!”.