←back to thread

Neuralink 'Participant 1' says his life has changed

(fortune.com)
360 points danielmorozoff | 1 comments | 24 Aug 25 09:12 UTC | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
arnaudsm ◴[26 Aug 25 22:44 UTC] No.45033273[source]▶
[flagged]
replies(19): >>45033369 #>>45033390 #>>45033472 #>>45033493 #>>45033528 #>>45033691 #>>45033977 #>>45034012 #>>45034276 #>>45034628 #>>45034780 #>>45034920 #>>45035070 #>>45035284 #>>45035406 #>>45035412 #>>45035600 #>>45035609 #>>45035620 #
modeless ◴[26 Aug 25 23:38 UTC] No.45033691[source]▶
Classic HN middlebrow dismissal, only upvoted because people dislike Musk. Word error rate of 25% is unusable. Also it needs extensive retraining every few days. They used four fixed electrode arrays, like pushing a miniature bed of nails into your brain, which is far more invasive and less advanced than Neuralink's one device with threads individually implanted by robot. Neuralink is not exclusively for speech, focusing more on general computer use. This is mostly about where the device is implanted, not the device's capabilities.

As for FSD, it leads by far for systems you can own, and while it is not as good as Waymo it is much cheaper and still rapidly improving. It is too early to say which approach will ultimately win.

replies(4): >>45033727 #>>45034073 #>>45034258 #>>45035246 #
1. FireBeyond ◴[27 Aug 25 03:45 UTC] No.45035246[source]▶
> Neuralink is not exclusively for speech, focusing more on general computer use. This is mostly about where the device is implanted, not the device's capabilities.

This is entirely ridiculous. There is no and will be no universal device that just works, and does different things depending on just where in the brain you happen to stick it.