←back to thread

364 points metalman | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
chasd00 ◴[] No.45034091[source]
Just saw the splash down. I think this was 100% successful test.
replies(4): >>45034127 #>>45034176 #>>45034815 #>>45036590 #
kersplody ◴[] No.45034176[source]
Not quite, but it's a major milestone. Still quite a bit of work to go on the rapid reusability part (burnt flaps, oxidized body, missing tiles, tile waterproofing). Starship might actually deliver payload to orbit on flight 11.
replies(3): >>45034203 #>>45034247 #>>45034855 #
rlt ◴[] No.45034247[source]
They mentioned in the stream they were intentionally stressing the ship on reentry.

But yes, “rapid reusability” is a ways off. I expect they’ll be spending weeks inspecting and repairing ship and booster before reflight for a few years, but they’ll drive it down over time.

TBD how “rapid” the reusability ends up being in the end.

replies(2): >>45034363 #>>45034867 #
1. BurningFrog ◴[] No.45034867[source]
The ship and booster both sank in the ocean as planned, so there is no inspecting and repairing phase.

I think that work can be done quite well based on all the footage and other collected metrics.

replies(1): >>45042949 #
2. rlt ◴[] No.45042949[source]
I didn't mean this ship and booster, I mean in a year or so when they're done with the test phase and frequently launching Starlink satellites on Starship.