←back to thread

360 points danielmorozoff | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.004s | source
Show context
arnaudsm ◴[] No.45033273[source]
[flagged]
replies(19): >>45033369 #>>45033390 #>>45033472 #>>45033493 #>>45033528 #>>45033691 #>>45033977 #>>45034012 #>>45034276 #>>45034628 #>>45034780 #>>45034920 #>>45035070 #>>45035284 #>>45035406 #>>45035412 #>>45035600 #>>45035609 #>>45035620 #
modeless ◴[] No.45033691[source]
Classic HN middlebrow dismissal, only upvoted because people dislike Musk. Word error rate of 25% is unusable. Also it needs extensive retraining every few days. They used four fixed electrode arrays, like pushing a miniature bed of nails into your brain, which is far more invasive and less advanced than Neuralink's one device with threads individually implanted by robot. Neuralink is not exclusively for speech, focusing more on general computer use. This is mostly about where the device is implanted, not the device's capabilities.

As for FSD, it leads by far for systems you can own, and while it is not as good as Waymo it is much cheaper and still rapidly improving. It is too early to say which approach will ultimately win.

replies(4): >>45033727 #>>45034073 #>>45034258 #>>45035246 #
1. cramsession ◴[] No.45034073[source]
I have never seen stats showing that FSD is "rapidly improving". Quite the contrary, it seems hobbled by its backward hardware and plateaued in terms of progress.
replies(1): >>45034826 #
2. rogerrogerr ◴[] No.45034826[source]
The backward hardware in my 2020 car has plateaued at driving me driveway-to-parking-lot on 100% of my drives in recent history. It’s a pretty nice plateau, really.

(I admit I’m mocking your wording; in fact it has not plateaued. Just every update makes things slightly smoother in non-safety-critical ways.)

replies(1): >>45039770 #
3. cramsession ◴[] No.45039770[source]
Very nice of you to put everyone's lives at risk.