←back to thread

405 points Bogdanp | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
wk_end ◴[] No.45020948[source]
I don't follow him closely, but I'd always thought that John Gruber - while often a very good writer - got a little too much exposure to the Reality Distortion Field. So I'm a little surprised to see him come down so hard on this.

Was I wrong about Gruber or is this a proverbial canary in the coal mine?

replies(9): >>45020980 #>>45021018 #>>45021029 #>>45021041 #>>45021046 #>>45021543 #>>45021581 #>>45021625 #>>45021924 #
rgovostes ◴[] No.45021041[source]
Apple enthusiasts like John Gruber believe in an ideal Apple. (See his reference to the Founder's "backs of the cabinets" quote.) The real company is distinct from this ideal. Believers support the company's actions so long as they can be plausibly squared with the ideal. But when the company strays—by phoning in design, or being stingy (iCloud's 5 GB free tier)—they respond with equally vocal criticism.
replies(2): >>45021932 #>>45024905 #
1. coolandsmartrr ◴[] No.45021932[source]
This comment reminds of me of these such philosophical dualisms:

- Form (Formal Blueprint of Ideas) vs Appearances (Actual Manifestation of Ideas) (Plato)

- Noumenal (how things are in themselves) vs Phenomenal (how things appear) (Immanuel Kant)

Gruber has been an idealistic and longtime Apple observer. This is probably why he seems to invoke the Idea of Apple to compare and critique the current Appearance of Apple.

Fascinated to see a remark on HN that reminds me of this concept in philosophy.