←back to thread

808 points shaunpud | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ulrischa ◴[] No.45003303[source]
[flagged]
replies(14): >>45003337 #>>45003374 #>>45003410 #>>45003499 #>>45003518 #>>45003524 #>>45003575 #>>45003629 #>>45003661 #>>45003806 #>>45003857 #>>45003931 #>>45004178 #>>45004483 #
mtsr ◴[] No.45003337[source]
[flagged]
replies(21): >>45003342 #>>45003345 #>>45003346 #>>45003391 #>>45003392 #>>45003398 #>>45003404 #>>45003512 #>>45003529 #>>45003556 #>>45003595 #>>45003625 #>>45003637 #>>45003640 #>>45003723 #>>45003781 #>>45003796 #>>45003815 #>>45003880 #>>45004011 #>>45004548 #
littlecranky67 ◴[] No.45003392[source]
Clear case of "motive justifies the means". I think in a free democracy, no one should block any propaganda, as it the responsibility of the individual to asses what to read and what not. In a democracy, it is more dangerous to censor and justify the means with motive - this opens the door to unjust censorship.
replies(3): >>45003449 #>>45003631 #>>45003666 #
DoctorOW ◴[] No.45003666[source]
> Clear case of "motive justifies the means".

Except, in the case of RT, it was not justified in an abstract way at all. Consistently "reporting" on stories counter-indicated by all available evidence.

To put it another way, if a judge can imprison a murderer for life as justified by the motive of reducing murders, what's stopping them from imprisoning everyone with no justification at all? Well, in practice the evidence required is quite a hurdle to this.

If you're not arguing that RT is innocent of what it has been accused, then you're arguing against the concept of punitive action outright.

replies(2): >>45003855 #>>45003882 #
zahlman ◴[] No.45003855[source]
> Consistently "reporting" on stories counter-indicated by all available evidence.... If you're not arguing that RT is innocent of what it has been accused

Can you give a concrete example? (Somehow I cannot recall ever seeing one proactively volunteered, in years of people denigrating RT on the Internet.)

replies(1): >>45004025 #
1. DoctorOW ◴[] No.45004025[source]
Sure, they reported that Jewish individuals had to flee Ukraine due to a Nazi takeover and a supposed ongoing genocide. There's no evidence of the fleeing or the genocide happening. This was one of the false narratives cited in the EU court's ruling.

> Somehow I cannot recall ever seeing one proactively volunteered

I err on the side of brevity, not seeing a claim that RT's removal was unjust in the comment I was responding to, I felt no need to justify it myself.