(I'm sure there's a more sophisticated way to refer to this fallacy, but my point stands.)
You can prevent organizations whose aim is to destroy democracy by exercising some restrictions on democracy without completely dismantling free speech and democracy.
just as for example you may jail someone and completely restrict their freedom in order to protect others, without completely dismantling democracy
So it appears to me there are still elephants around
Democratic countries that are corrupt, weak and have poor cultural defense mechanisms against populism fail. In Germany such a mechanism is the one discussed in this thread, in the US it's a strong , almost religious belief in the constitution
Maybe we haven't observed Nazism rise again in Germany because the policies against Nazi expression, first implemented by the Allied occupying forces immediately after WWII, worked so well.