←back to thread

321 points distantprovince | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
phito ◴[] No.44617442[source]
I really wish some of my coworkers would stop using LLMs to write me emails or even Teams messages. It does feel extremely rude, to the point I don't even want to read them anymore.
replies(10): >>44617497 #>>44617500 #>>44617658 #>>44617721 #>>44617880 #>>44617940 #>>44618006 #>>44618504 #>>44619441 #>>44622817 #
lxgr ◴[] No.44617940[source]
"Hey, I can't help but notice that some of the messages you're sending me are partially LLM-generated. I appreciate you wanting to communicate stylistically and grammatically correct, but I personally prefer the occasional typo or inelegant expression over the chance of distorted meanings or lost/hallucinated context.

Going forward, could you please communicate with me directly? I really don't mind a lack of capitalization or colloquial expressions in internal communications."

replies(3): >>44619024 #>>44619799 #>>44620829 #
pyman ◴[] No.44619024[source]
I see two things people are not happy about when it comes to LLMs:

1. The message you sent doesn't feel personal. It reads like something written by a machine, and I struggle to connect with someone who sends me messages like that.

2. People who don't speak English very well are now sending me perfectly written messages with solid arguments. And honestly, my ego doest’t like it because I used to think I was more intelligent than them. Turns out I wasn't. It was just my perception, based on the fact that I speak the language natively.

Both of these things won't matter anymore in the next two or three years. LLMs will keep getting smarter, while our egos will keep getting smaller.

People still don't fully grasp just how much LLMs will reshape the way we communicate and work, for better or worse.

replies(2): >>44620549 #>>44624745 #
throwaway328 ◴[] No.44620549[source]
The word for this, we learned recently, is "LLM inevitabilism". It's often argued for far more convincingly than your attempt here, too.

The future is here, and even if you don't like it, and even if it's worse, you'll take it anyway. Because it's the future. Because... some megalomaniacal dweeb somewhere said so?

When does this hype train get to the next station, so everyone can take a breath? All this "future" has us hyperventilating.

replies(2): >>44620721 #>>44620750 #
1. johnnyanmac ◴[] No.44620750[source]
Probably in a few years. The big Disney lawsuit may be that needle that pops the bubble.

I do agree about this push for inevitable. in small ways this is true. But it doesn't need to take over every aspect of humanity. We have calculators but we still at the very least do basic mental math and don't resort to calculators for 5 + 5. It's been long established as rude to do more than quick glances at your phone when physically meeting people. We leaned against posting google search/wiki links as a response in forums.

Culture still shapes a lot of how we use the modern tools we have.

replies(1): >>44622170 #
2. staticautomatic ◴[] No.44622170[source]
Disney is a good one to bet on. They basically have the most sophisticated IP lawyering team in world history.