←back to thread

324 points rntn | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.215s | source
Show context
cakealert ◴[] No.44612557[source]
EU regulations are sometimes able to bully the world into compliance (eg. cookies).

Usually minorities are able to impose "wins" on a majority when the price of compliance is lower than the price of defiance.

This is not the case with AI. The stakes are enormous. AI is full steam ahead and no one is getting in the way short of nuclear war.

replies(2): >>44612773 #>>44613635 #
encom ◴[] No.44613635[source]
The only thing the cookie law has accomplished for users, is pestering everyone with endless popups (full of dark patterns). WWW is pretty much unbearable to use without uBlock filtering that nonsense away. User tracking and fingerprinting has moved server side. Zero user privacy has been gained, because there's too much money to be made and the industry routed around this brain dead legislation.
replies(2): >>44614022 #>>44617784 #
red_trumpet ◴[] No.44614022[source]
> User tracking and fingerprinting has moved server side.

This smells like a misconception of the GDPR. The GDPR is not about cookies, it is about tracking. You are not allowed to track your users without consent, even if you do not use any cookies.

replies(1): >>44614976 #
whatevaa ◴[] No.44614976[source]
Login is tracking, even when login is functional, not for tracking.

Laws are analyzed by lawyers and they will err on side of caution, so you end up with these notices.

replies(1): >>44617856 #
1. sublimefire ◴[] No.44617856[source]
Cookies and crossdomain tracking is slightly different to a login. Login would occur on one platform and would not track you when you go on to amazon or some porn site or read infowars. But crossdomain cookies do not need auth and they are everywhere because webmasters get paid for adding them, they track you everywhere.