←back to thread

234 points gloxkiqcza | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
Retr0id ◴[] No.44572211[source]
Previously, a convenient and low-latency way to bypass UK internet censorship was to proxy via a local datacentre - it's only the residential ISPs that are under pressure to censor traffic, commercial ones less so.

But if the blocking is happening somewhere other than the ISP, this is less effective. A hypothetical TPB user might want to proxy via Luxembourg now (seems like the shortest hop to somewhere with sane legislation)

replies(1): >>44572305 #
trollied ◴[] No.44572305[source]
You didn’t even need to do that. Just needed an /etc/hosts entry for the domain.
replies(1): >>44572381 #
Retr0id ◴[] No.44572381[source]
My ISP (Virgin Media) does DNS filtering and IP-based blocking and TLS SNI inspection. So you have to use ESNI or domain fronting, which last time I checked my browser could not be easily configured to do.
replies(3): >>44572588 #>>44572615 #>>44574295 #
1. acheong08 ◴[] No.44574295[source]
At this point, what's the difference between the UK and China other than the specific content they block? Some ISPs have even started blocking wireguard here & I've had to resort back to xray/v2ray
replies(1): >>44574468 #
2. Retr0id ◴[] No.44574468[source]
Very little difference. But blocking wireguard is huge change, which ISPs are doing that?
replies(1): >>44577097 #
3. acheong08 ◴[] No.44577097[source]
I currently live in student accommodation so not sure what they're using upstream. The university network also drops wireguard connections but only to known providers like Mullvad (assuming obfuscation is off)