←back to thread

Supreme Court's ruling practically wipes out free speech for sex writing online

(ellsberg.substack.com)
693 points macawfish | 1 comments | 12 Jul 25 18:14 UTC | HN request time: 0.207s | source
Show context
stego-tech ◴[12 Jul 25 22:01 UTC] No.44545563[source]▶
[flagged]
replies(13): >>44545616 #>>44545682 #>>44545696 #>>44545710 #>>44545757 #>>44545790 #>>44545791 #>>44545797 #>>44545819 #>>44545845 #>>44545912 #>>44546077 #>>44546515 #
beejiu[dead post] ◴[12 Jul 25 22:56 UTC] No.44545912[source]▶
[flagged]
kennywinker[dead post] ◴[12 Jul 25 22:59 UTC] No.44545926[source]▶
[flagged]
beejiu ◴[12 Jul 25 23:05 UTC] No.44545963[source]▶
Yes, it should apply to all medical treatments targeted at children, since children don't have developed critical thinking skills.

Do you think it's appropriate for random people to tell a 10 year old how to take their insulin? I don't.

replies(4): >>44546023 #>>44546043 #>>44546354 #>>44548409 #
1. jmb99 ◴[13 Jul 25 07:57 UTC] No.44548409[source]▶
> since children don't have developed critical thinking skills.

So should everyone under the age of 25 (roughly when your brain becomes fully developed) be prohibited from talking about any kind of medical treatment?

Also, how do you expect people to develop critical thinking skills if they’re never presented with challenging concepts or, you know, required to think critically about things?