(0x44.xyz)

1036 points deryilz | 1 comments | 12 Jul 25 19:06 UTC | HN request time: 0.446s | source

Show context

labrador ◴[12 Jul 25 19:53 UTC] No.44544639[source]▶

I'd gladly pay for YouTube without ads if I trusted that it would remain ad free, but the track record from various companies on this is not good.

replies(11): >>44544646 #>>44544655 #>>44544660 #>>44544691 #>>44544696 #>>44544706 #>>44544736 #>>44544799 #>>44545011 #>>44545106 #>>44545121 #

iLoveOncall ◴[12 Jul 25 19:54 UTC] No.44544646[source]▶

>>44544639 #

So pay now and stop paying if they introduce ads? It's not like it's a lifetime subscription.

I've been paying for it for a year+ for my girlfriend who was watching more ads than content and we've never seen ads since.

replies(2): >>44544663 #>>44544755 #

labrador ◴[12 Jul 25 19:56 UTC] No.44544663[source]▶

>>44544646 #

That's good to know. I was hoping for a reply like yours. I will subscribe. YouTube is an amazing resource for human kind and I agree those of us who can afford it should pay to support it.

replies(1): >>44547370 #

1. rightbyte ◴[13 Jul 25 04:00 UTC] No.44547370[source]▶

>>44544663 #

Seems strange to me to support Google with your money from a moral perspective. It is a spyware company.

↑

Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update