←back to thread

Supreme Court's ruling practically wipes out free speech for sex writing online

(ellsberg.substack.com)
693 points macawfish | 1 comments | 12 Jul 25 18:14 UTC | HN request time: 2.539s | source
Show context
stego-tech ◴[12 Jul 25 22:01 UTC] No.44545563[source]▶
[flagged]
replies(13): >>44545616 #>>44545682 #>>44545696 #>>44545710 #>>44545757 #>>44545790 #>>44545791 #>>44545797 #>>44545819 #>>44545845 #>>44545912 #>>44546077 #>>44546515 #
beejiu[dead post] ◴[12 Jul 25 22:56 UTC] No.44545912[source]▶
[flagged]
kennywinker[dead post] ◴[12 Jul 25 22:59 UTC] No.44545926[source]▶
[flagged]
beejiu ◴[12 Jul 25 23:05 UTC] No.44545963[source]▶
Yes, it should apply to all medical treatments targeted at children, since children don't have developed critical thinking skills.

Do you think it's appropriate for random people to tell a 10 year old how to take their insulin? I don't.

replies(4): >>44546023 #>>44546043 #>>44546354 #>>44548409 #
Kinrany ◴[12 Jul 25 23:16 UTC] No.44546043[source]▶
I agree, but it can go too far as well. It's not healthy for children to be limited to knowing only their parents' and the government's opinions on serious topics. There has to be a balance between avoiding indoctrination and being aware of brain development schedule.
replies(1): >>44546072 #
1. beejiu ◴[12 Jul 25 23:21 UTC] No.44546072[source]▶
I somewhat agree, but exposure to global online content is hardly natural in terms of brain development.