(ellsberg.substack.com)

693 points macawfish | 2 comments | 12 Jul 25 18:14 UTC | HN request time: 0.463s | source

Show context

stego-tech ◴[12 Jul 25 22:01 UTC] No.44545563[source]▶

[flagged]

replies(13): >>44545616 #>>44545682 #>>44545696 #>>44545710 #>>44545757 #>>44545790 #>>44545791 #>>44545797 #>>44545819 #>>44545845 #>>44545912 #>>44546077 #>>44546515 #

beejiu[dead post] ◴[12 Jul 25 22:56 UTC] No.44545912[source]▶

>>44545563 #

[flagged]

kennywinker[dead post] ◴[12 Jul 25 22:59 UTC] No.44545926[source]▶

>>44545912 #

[flagged]

1. giingyui ◴[12 Jul 25 23:04 UTC] No.44545952[source]▶

>>44545926 #

I always wonder if these arguments are ever made in good faith. Comparing a treatment for diabetes to HRT. But there are people who really are off the deep end. So who knows.

replies(1): >>44546014 #

2. kennywinker ◴[12 Jul 25 23:12 UTC] No.44546014[source]▶

>>44545952 (TP) #

Made in good faith. And HRT is very rarely given to minors. The standard of care is puberty blockers until their 18.

Question about your good faith:

Do you have a problem with puberty blockers when given to non-trans kids? I.e. for precocious puberty

↑

Supreme Court's ruling practically wipes out free speech for sex writing online