←back to thread

1034 points deryilz | 8 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source | bottom
Show context
labrador ◴[] No.44544639[source]
I'd gladly pay for YouTube without ads if I trusted that it would remain ad free, but the track record from various companies on this is not good.
replies(11): >>44544646 #>>44544655 #>>44544660 #>>44544691 #>>44544696 #>>44544706 #>>44544736 #>>44544799 #>>44545011 #>>44545106 #>>44545121 #
j45 ◴[] No.44544696[source]
Youtube premium has remained adfree as far as I know.

Best to try it out yourself. I can't watch Youtube with Ads ever anymore.

If a 100% Ad-free youtube premium at the current price point ever went away, something would have to change about the ads.

replies(2): >>44544739 #>>44544839 #
theoreticalmal ◴[] No.44544839[source]
I get an ad-free YouTube experience for $0 with software. Why do you pay for it?
replies(2): >>44544968 #>>44545008 #
cbeley ◴[] No.44545008[source]
Because I want to actually support content creators. I also want it to be more normalized to pay for things vs having ad supported content.
replies(4): >>44545031 #>>44545211 #>>44546000 #>>44546552 #
1. fakedang ◴[] No.44545211[source]
Folks be adopting all sorts of irrational arguments just so they can defend their habits. Do you also prefer having middlemen in other areas such as healthcare and education?

Creators can just as easily pop a Patreon or BuyMeACoffee these days in a few clicks. In fact, most creators constantly admit that Google pays them peanuts for their view counts. But support the leviathan for reasons unknown I guess.

replies(3): >>44545453 #>>44545764 #>>44547290 #
2. cbeley ◴[] No.44545453[source]
I also back people on patreon. Isn't it irrational to expect something for free? If you don't like the service or it doesn't align with your values, simply don't use it.

Also, isn't patreon also a middleman by your definition?

replies(1): >>44547673 #
3. WrongAssumption ◴[] No.44545764[source]
Patreon and BuyMeACoffee are middlemen...
replies(1): >>44547675 #
4. j45 ◴[] No.44547290[source]
It’s a personal choice.

Once someone reaches a level of individual support that’s fine.

YouTube remains a place for discovering channels and people and some people especially the majority who are not technical, can outwit a simple family fee.

I use YouTube premium more than I ever used for paying Netflix for far longer. Value (and proven convenience) is in the eyes of the user.

replies(1): >>44547694 #
5. fakedang ◴[] No.44547673[source]
There's a difference between a middleman that simply ensures that you're paid for your work on a fixed commission-based model, and a middleman who basically controls the entire platform you use to reach your audience. A better analogy would be OnlyFans vs a pimp.
6. fakedang ◴[] No.44547675[source]
There's a difference between a middleman that simply ensures that you're paid for your work on a fixed commission-based model, and a middleman who basically controls the entire platform you use to reach your audience. A better analogy would be OnlyFans vs a pimp.
7. fakedang ◴[] No.44547694[source]
I agree about YouTube being a platform for discovering new content, and even great content. I've even bought Premium for my parents and brother just so they wouldn't need to go through all sorts of ads on YouTube.

I would have bought the argument of the commenter if they talked about buying Premium to support the platform. But buying Premium to support the content creators? That's a bunch of horse manure.

replies(1): >>44576835 #
8. j45 ◴[] No.44576835{3}[source]
I think primary and secondary motivations are OK - I'm not sure how the premium subscriptions are distributed to content creators other than by ad revenue.

One thing is for sure - an ad-free family is much more peaceful and able to enjoy the content itself, which can bode well for connecting with the content creators and appreciating the platform for what it is, and once was.