←back to thread

Bill Atkinson's psychedelic user interface

(patternproject.substack.com)
453 points cainxinth | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.207s | source
Show context
brainless ◴[] No.44532425[source]
I am on the fence with these topics because I have years of fear drilled into me. These topics are a taboo and I have rarely ever tried anything at all. The experiences did not ruin me, they made me more curious about my brain in a positive way. But the social taboo lingers.

What surprises me the most is that we have accepted sugar, alcohol, cigarettes and a ton of mass manufactured food which are harming us. I am struggling with high blood glucose for 12 years. Yet, the substance which I can grow in my* own backyard and may actually not be as harmful is just brainwashed out of my limits.

edits: you to me

replies(3): >>44532438 #>>44535814 #>>44541699 #
numpad0 ◴[] No.44541699[source]
Isn't the distinction based on whether the substance directly cause a wage gap and/or significant life expectancy loss? Someone on meth all the time can literally fatigue-free until there is no brain matter left, but someone on coffee or beer can not.

It is often argued that some of generally illegal substances like marijuana is only toxic to comparable extents as legal substances, but there are observations that it seem to trigger some types of megalomaniac schizophrenia, so the fence probably has reasons to be there, I think.

replies(1): >>44541789 #
1. mcherm ◴[] No.44541789[source]
> Isn't the distinction based on whether the substance directly cause a wage gap and/or significant life expectancy loss?

No. I feel QUITE certain that the distinction is based on whether or not the substance has a history of a few generations of widespread use among western Europeans ("white people").