←back to thread

903 points rcchen | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.424s | source
Show context
rvnx ◴[] No.44537080[source]
Windsurf and Cursor are in the business of reselling ChatGPT and Claude at a loss, but the tech itself is not impressive at all
replies(1): >>44537096 #
cpursley ◴[] No.44537096[source]
Those wrappers are gonna go away now that there's Claude Code and Googles CLI thing. They are that much better.
replies(2): >>44537734 #>>44538495 #
warmedcookie ◴[] No.44538495[source]
Are they?

Cursor's Accept / Reject feature for each change it makes in each file is nice whereas I have to use a diff tool to review the changes in Claude Code.

Also, if I go down a prompt alley that's a dead end, Cursor has the Restore Checkpoint feature to get back to the original prompt and try a different path. With Claude Code, you had better have committed the code to git, otherwise you end up with a mess you didn't want.

My company pays for both, but I mostly use Cursor unless I know I am doing a new project or some proof of concept, which Claude Code might have an edge on with a more mature TODO list feature.

replies(3): >>44538721 #>>44540124 #>>44541059 #
mindwok ◴[] No.44541059[source]
None of these features are very deep though, there’s dozens of OSS clones for them already.
replies(1): >>44541383 #
1. rvnx ◴[] No.44541383[source]
RooCode/Cline, etc