←back to thread

883 points rcchen | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.227s | source
Show context
dalemhurley ◴[] No.44537376[source]
Cursor (and Garry Tan’s X post) has shown us that the VC money is propping up these companies astounding growth, the only way for them to become profitable is to increase the cost per a request, which means they need to innovate like crazy.

The moat is paper thin.

GitHub has open sourced copilot.

The open source community is working hard on their own projects.

No doubt Cursor is moving fast to create amazing innovations, but if the competition only focuses on thin wrappers they are not worth the billion dollar valuations.

I love watching this space as it is moving extremely fast.

replies(7): >>44537680 #>>44537693 #>>44537910 #>>44537998 #>>44538331 #>>44540883 #>>44542513 #
parthdesai ◴[] No.44538331[source]
Gary gives off a grifter vibe to me. Such a shame seeing how YC has fallen
replies(1): >>44538852 #
sebmellen ◴[] No.44538852[source]
He blocked me (a relative nobody) on X for remarking on the number of people I know who’ve made it to YC on completely fraudulent credentials.
replies(1): >>44540055 #
atakan_gurkan ◴[] No.44540055[source]
His reaction seems entirely appropriate. He could ignore you, but then you might keep replying to his posts and potentially spread incorrect but damaging information. He is losing close to zero by blocking you, but preventing a potential big loss. Why did you make that remark, if not to damage YC's reputation? This does not seem like the correct approach, if you wanted to improve their selection process.
replies(3): >>44540152 #>>44541095 #>>44543048 #
1. raincole ◴[] No.44541095[source]
Well, incorrect or not, now that person has a very strong motivation to talk bad about YC. Smart "reaction."