←back to thread

724 points simonw | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.66s | source
Show context
marcusb ◴[] No.44527530[source]
This reminds me in a way of the old Noam Chomsky/Tucker Carlson exchange where Chomsky says to Carlson:

  "I’m sure you believe everything you’re saying. But what I’m saying is that if you believed something different, you wouldn’t be sitting where you’re sitting."
Simon may well be right - xAI might not have directly instructed Grok to check what the boss thinks before responding - but that's not to say xAI wouldn't be more likely to release a model that does agree with the boss a lot and privileges what he has said when reasoning.
replies(5): >>44528694 #>>44528695 #>>44528706 #>>44528766 #>>44529331 #
dupsik ◴[] No.44528706[source]
That quote was not from a conversation with Tucker Carlson: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nBx-37c3c8
replies(3): >>44528813 #>>44528982 #>>44530494 #
marcusb ◴[] No.44530494[source]
My mistake, thank you.
replies(1): >>44533237 #
acquiesce[dead post] ◴[] No.44533237[source]
[flagged]
1. marcusb ◴[] No.44533380[source]
Sorry. Site rules prevent me from responding to your comment in the manner in which it deserves.

Have a nice day.

replies(1): >>44533958 #
2. lcnPylGDnU4H9OF ◴[] No.44534233[source]
Based on the timing of the comments they would not have been able to edit their comment at the time yours was posted, nor even at the time they posted the one you replied to (edit: nor even at the time they were corrected). There is a 2-hour window for editing comments.

It's also really obnoxious to demand that strangers do things to fit your sensibilities. I get the feeling they didn't want to say anything about it because they would have used less friendly words than "obnoxious", which is already not particularly friendly.