←back to thread

Bill Atkinson's psychedelic user interface

(patternproject.substack.com)
429 points cainxinth | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.428s | source
Show context
demiters ◴[] No.44531227[source]
Not a big fan of the ongoing productisation of transcendental, possibly brain-scrambling experiences. Keeping them somewhat less accessible tends to filter out people who don't do their homework to understand the substance and who consider it just another novel experience to try on a whim, which increases the risk of negative outcomes.
replies(14): >>44531266 #>>44531301 #>>44531309 #>>44531336 #>>44531403 #>>44532013 #>>44532020 #>>44532191 #>>44533028 #>>44533191 #>>44533451 #>>44533539 #>>44534271 #>>44536123 #
hnlmorg ◴[] No.44531266[source]
That has been various governments approach to drugs for literally decades and it got us nowhere.

The problem isnt that this still is casually available. Drugs have been casually available since forever.

The problem is that pushing drug usage to the fringes makes it less safe for people who haven’t done their homework. Ironically the exact opposite of that you claimed.

replies(2): >>44531308 #>>44531675 #
mathiaspoint ◴[] No.44531675[source]
I think with psychedelics it's fine. The problems you're talking about are with addictive stimulants.
replies(1): >>44532575 #
asveikau ◴[] No.44532575[source]
With psychedelics the risk profile is very different. Firstly, people can do harmful things during the trip. Second, a more vague, difficult to measure and predict concern around long term psychological effects to some people.
replies(1): >>44532783 #
1. mathiaspoint ◴[] No.44532783[source]
Right, my pronoun is dangling here. "It" was meant to refer to the status quo of making them inaccessible without a lot of difficulty and breaking the law.