←back to thread

Apple vs the Law

(formularsumo.co.uk)
377 points tempodox | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jjcob ◴[] No.44529703[source]
I think at this point we should change the law so that Gatekeepers aren't just required to enable competition, but are somehow forced to actually support competition.

I'm not sure how we could enforce that, but maybe the law could stipulate that a certain minimum percentage of users must use 3rd party app stores, or use web apps. They should pay a fine if less than say 5% of apps are distributed outside the app store, or if less than 5% of people use a 3rd party browser engine.

replies(3): >>44530113 #>>44534646 #>>44538360 #
bzzzt ◴[] No.44530113[source]
First they have to enable competition, you're saying they have to support it but seemingly you want to enforce it. Where does it stop? Should Apple just pay out a part of their profits to their competitors?

If a competitor wants market share they have to build a better service. Forcing users to go with a bad deal gets the incentives all wrong and is actually bad for consumer choice.

replies(3): >>44530329 #>>44530413 #>>44530689 #
1. ohdeargodno ◴[] No.44530329[source]
> Forcing users to go with a bad deal gets the incentives all wrong and is actually bad for consumer choice.

Nice bad faith strawman, where'd you buy it ?

Apple is trying to have its cake and eat it too, selling off their devices as general computing devices and opening it partly to external developers, taking away a massive portion of profits and threatening them when it's not advantageous to them. The entire point is that you _cannot_ build a better service because Apple is blocking you.

Sony isn't getting this treatment for the PS5, despite qualifying well for being a gatekeeper, because there's no pretenses of being an open market.

If Apple wants out of this, then let them close down the App Store.