←back to thread

724 points simonw | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.218s | source
Show context
marcusb ◴[] No.44527530[source]
This reminds me in a way of the old Noam Chomsky/Tucker Carlson exchange where Chomsky says to Carlson:

  "I’m sure you believe everything you’re saying. But what I’m saying is that if you believed something different, you wouldn’t be sitting where you’re sitting."
Simon may well be right - xAI might not have directly instructed Grok to check what the boss thinks before responding - but that's not to say xAI wouldn't be more likely to release a model that does agree with the boss a lot and privileges what he has said when reasoning.
replies(5): >>44528694 #>>44528695 #>>44528706 #>>44528766 #>>44529331 #
chatmasta ◴[] No.44528694[source]
I'm confused why we need a model here when this is just standard Lucene search syntax supported by Twitter for years... is the issue that its owner doesn't realize this exists?

Not only that, but I can even link you directly [0] to it! No agent required, and I can even construct the link so it's sorted by most recent first...

[0] https://x.com/search?q=from%3Aelonmusk%20(Israel%20OR%20Pale...

replies(4): >>44528738 #>>44528767 #>>44528788 #>>44532662 #
1. eddythompson80 ◴[] No.44528767[source]
The user asked Grok “what do you think about the conflict”, Grok “decided” to search twitter for what is Elon’s public opinion is presumably to take it into account.

I’m guessing the accusation is that it’s either prompted, or otherwise trained by xAI to, uh…, handle the particular CEO/product they have.