←back to thread

165 points starkparker | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.455s | source
Show context
thomascountz ◴[] No.44525985[source]
> We determined that the probable cause of this accident was the in-flight separation of the left MED plug due to Boeing’s failure to provide adequate training, guidance, and oversight necessary to ensure that manufacturing personnel could consistently and correctly comply with its parts removal process, which was intended to document and ensure that the securing bolts and hardware that were removed to facilitate rework during the manufacturing process were properly reinstalled.

A bit OT, but what a gorgeous whale of a sentence! As always, the literary prowess of NTSB writers does not disappoint.

replies(11): >>44526007 #>>44526135 #>>44526208 #>>44526228 #>>44526278 #>>44526384 #>>44526528 #>>44526546 #>>44526632 #>>44526688 #>>44535189 #
ryandrake ◴[] No.44526278[source]
Reading aviation-related NTSB final reports is kind of a hobby of mine, and I must say, the NTSB is generally a treasure! Sure, you can find issues with some of their investigations, roads they might not have probed down as far as they could, but their culture of root causing and transparently reporting should be emulated across the government. I really hope they don't fall victim to the casual, random destruction our current administration is inflicting on broad swaths of the government.
replies(2): >>44526377 #>>44526609 #
frumplestlatz ◴[] No.44526377[source]
The current aims of the executive branch are neither casual nor random, and I doubt the NTSB is in their crosshairs.

The goals are both obvious and specific; it’s a culture war being fought at the funding level.

replies(2): >>44526424 #>>44526630 #
1. cosmicgadget ◴[] No.44526424[source]
There is the culture war but don't ignore the dealmaking and profiteering. This can create the appearance of randomness because any entity can appeal to the executive for favor.

Sounds like in this case either Boeing didn't donate enough or, more likely, nobody wants to f with airliner safety.

replies(1): >>44526471 #
2. lukan ◴[] No.44526471[source]
"or, more likely, nobody wants to f with airliner safety"

If that would be more likely, Boeing wouldn't be, where it is.

To me it seems more likely Boeing has now too much attention on them, making fraud here even more dangerous/expensive.