←back to thread

171 points _sbl_ | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.8s | source
Show context
oc1 ◴[] No.44522688[source]
<< According to official records, the design for the bridge shifted multiple times over the past seven years, largely due to conflicts between the Public Works Department (PWD) and the Railways. The two agencies couldn’t agree on how to share land, and in trying to work around both railway property and the new Metro line, they ended up producing a final layout with an abrupt 90-degree angle.

I love that mindset. Europeans would have simply refused and 100 years later it would have probably been build after all legal has been cleared. Indians instead never say no. That's how you build software, so why not bridges.

replies(14): >>44522771 #>>44522797 #>>44522901 #>>44523126 #>>44523197 #>>44523198 #>>44523260 #>>44523451 #>>44523656 #>>44523670 #>>44523959 #>>44527192 #>>44527686 #>>44529344 #
cs702 ◴[] No.44523260[source]
Shouldn't the bureaucracies be penalized, instead of the poor engineers?

The engineers built the 90-degree layout specified by their clients!

I wouldn't be surprised if there's a paper trail documenting the engineers' objections, signed and notarized by the clients.

It's hard for me to judge the engineers without knowing more.

replies(6): >>44523356 #>>44523517 #>>44523544 #>>44523630 #>>44525019 #>>44529354 #
Enginerrrd ◴[] No.44523544[source]
No. I'm a licensed civil engineer in the US. The license comes with an explicit duty to the public, to uphold public safety. I am in responsible charge of the work I produce and personally liable for the safety of that work, in perpetuity, and it SHOULD be that way. Any plans that I produce are subject to that standard.

India has a similar system for public works projects where a licensed engineer MUST supervise the work.

Frankly, sometimes I think the software world would be a lot better off with a similar system.

replies(2): >>44523746 #>>44529393 #
FinnKuhn ◴[] No.44523746[source]
This doesn't look unsafe though, just inconvenient.

Both in the US[1] and UK[2] you can find bridges with actual 90-degree angles. The one in India[3] is more like 75 degrees.

[1]https://maps.app.goo.gl/3CBqVHbVEtonHjcr9 [2]https://maps.app.goo.gl/8cVB44VDJRPadY6s6 [3]https://maps.app.goo.gl/ikPSmLEGYwVJLqDz7

replies(5): >>44523897 #>>44523958 #>>44524021 #>>44524696 #>>44525660 #
1. AnnikaL ◴[] No.44523958[source]
The second link is in Canada.
replies(2): >>44524708 #>>44532935 #
2. Fluorescence ◴[] No.44524708[source]
"New Westminster, British Columbia" lol. It looked nothing like the UK but at least they didn't plump for Colombia!

Anyway, here is a real British one:

https://maps.app.goo.gl/VAdfguBXNcDB74Yu5

I don't think it's that uncommon especially when crossing rivers because roads typically run along the river bank. A lot of roads and field boundaries were set down 1000s of years ago.

The British way is that so long as you put up big 'ol black and white arrows then 90° is child's play, it could be a 180° hairpin. I don't drive much but I hated multi-story-car-park-spiral ramps that for four floors would be a 1560° turn at full lock in a small car. Feels like I am failing astronaut training as my stomach turns over.

replies(1): >>44526868 #
3. soneil ◴[] No.44526868[source]
There's been a bridge there since the 13th century, and the current bridge is a listed structure built 1857. It's not really something you'd choose to build today.
4. FinnKuhn ◴[] No.44532935[source]
That is my mistake, very sorry for that. Apparently that changed all the way back in 1867. Oops.